Governance has to meet your systems where they are.
A governance tool that requires you to rebuild your architecture first will never get deployed. Integration flexibility is the point, not a feature.
What Shastra is designed to connect to.
These are architectural categories, not a list of shipped connectors. We are not going to display logos for integrations that do not exist yet.
Applications & APIs
The services that actually collect and use personal data.
Data stores
Databases and warehouses where personal data comes to rest.
Cloud infrastructure
The environments those systems run in.
Identity systems
Who your users are, and how they are authenticated.
Internal tools
The admin panels and back-office systems that quietly touch real data.
Developer infrastructure
Where governance can be checked before it reaches production.
No integration catalogue yet.
Shastra is pre-launch and we are not publishing a grid of partner logos to imply an ecosystem that does not exist. When specific integrations ship, they will be listed by name with what they actually do.
More detail
If a particular system is critical for you, tell us during pre-registration. That is genuinely how the early integration order gets decided.
The integration and proxy layers.
Diagram: a user talks to the Compliance Copilot, which operates Shastra. Shastra contains a governance engine and an integration layer, with three optional layers: a proxy layer, an enforcement layer and an evidence layer.
Shastra is pre-launch.
Pre-registration is open, and no pricing is published while the product is still being built.
Related: the DPDP Act explained · the Compliance Copilot